Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5198 14
Original file (NR5198 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 5S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

JSR
Docket No: NR5198-14
19 June 20134

 

Dear Staff Sergeant Fg

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 er the
United States Code, section 1552.

You requested removing the fitness reports for 1 January to 25
June 2007, 11 July to 31 December 2009 and 19 May to 31 December
2010.

It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has
directed modifying the contested report for 1 January to 25 June
2007 by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed
and Additional Comments”), “MRO [Marine reported on] is assigned
to the Body Composition Program.” and “SECT[ion] A, Item 5a:

MRO is currently assigned to the Body Composition Program." and

removing, from section K.4 (reviewing officer's comments), “RS
[reporting senior] is on the mark with regards to Body
Composition Program." ; and modifying the contested report for 193

May to 31 December 2010 by removing, from section I, "- Section
A, Item 5a: This is an adverse report due to MRO being assigned
to the Body Composition Program on 11 August 2010.” and
removing, from section K.4, *. SNM [Subject named Marine] was
recommentied for promotion but cannot be promoted while on the
Body Composition Program."

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 19 June 2014. your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted

On/
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
three reports of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC}
Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), one dated 15 April
2014 and two dated 17 April 2014, and the HQOMC e-mail dated 5
May 2014 (amending the PERB report dated 17 April 2014
concerning the contested fitness report for 1 January to 25 June
2007), copies of which are attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the reports of the PERB
as amended. Accordingly, your application for relief beyond
that effected by CMC has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of reguiarity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9353 14

    Original file (NR9353 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08027-10

    Original file (08027-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “SECT[ion] A, Item 5a- MRO [Marine reported on] was assigned to the BCP [Body Composition Program] during this reporting period for being outside of Marine Corps physical fitness and weight standards. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12181-09

    Original file (12181-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specifically, cmc has directed removing, from section I (reporting senior's “Directed and Additional Comments”), “Directed Comment, Sect [ion] A, 8F: MRO [Marine reported on] was assigned to the Body Composition Program (BCP) during this reporting period.” and from section K.4 (reviewing officer’s comments), “due to her assignment to BCP.” By electronic mail dated 10 March 2010, a copy of which is attached, the staff of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) advised Headquarters...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7160 13

    Original file (NR7160 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by changing the beginning date from 1 April 2007 to 14 July 2007 (and filing an administrative filler for 1 April to 13 July 2007); removing, from section I (reporting senior's “Directed and Additional Comments”), “MRO [Marine reported on] is currently enrolled in the BCP [Body Composition Program] program." A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3237 14

    Original file (NR3237 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2014. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 12 March 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10596 14

    Original file (NR10596 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “MRO [Marine reported on] being assigned to the BCP [Body Composition Program] “ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014 Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7247 14

    Original file (NR7247 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    and by removing “Directed Comment, Sectfion] A, Item Tb: recommend that the MRO [Marine reported on] not be considered for promotion with his contemporaries.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR1054 15

    Original file (NR1054 15.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    JSR . Docket No: NR1O54-15 DN awed 1 ONTe dar ape tt tee tet ol This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You requested completely removing the fitness report for 23 May to 31 December 2007.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12997 14

    Original file (NR12997 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5265 14

    Original file (NR5265 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Tt is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”) of the contested report for 30 September 2022 to 25 June 2013 by removing the word “capable” from the First sentence and in the fifth sentence, changing the comma after the word “complete” to a period and removing “MRO [Marine reported on] should attend MOS [military occupational specialty] school at first opportunity.” and modifying section...